How breakthrough deaths are reported on differently
Perhaps it is the fear of reprisal at the hands of government and medical authorities; or maybe it is a momentary relapse into actual journalism. Whatever the inspiration, news outlets suddenly remember responsible reporting, when writing about breakthrough deaths; (deaths of people who have been fully vaccinated against COVID-19).
Take for instance, this report on the death of an octogenarian from the Cayman Islands. It reads: “An 86-year-old patient who was fully vaccinated but suffering from severe comorbidities, died Wednesday as a result of COVID-19 related causes.”
The most striking thing about this sober line of reporting, is not what’s included; but what was left out. This patient’s death, was not mindlessly and inaccurately reported, as a COVID-19 death; which is always the case with the death of an unvaccinated person. No. In this report, the individual’s age and health complications were actually included.
And even though it must be sad for his family; when people die, old and sick, it shouldn’t come as a surprise.
Journalism Forgotten When Covering The Unvaccinated
Now compare the sobriety of this reporting on the death of a vaccinated individual, to this story covered yesterday, about the death of an unvaccinated elderly Barbadian woman. It reads: “A 60-year-old unvaccinated woman passed away from the viral illness [COVID-19] on Tuesday, at the Harrison’s Point Isolation Facility.”
But how exactly was the cause of death determined; and how was it concluded that she died from COVID-19? Was an autopsy carried out? Was any scientific evidence found proving COVID-19 to be the cause of death? Or did she die within a certain time frame of testing positive?
My money’s on the latter, as this sort of death stuffing has been widely utilised since this pandemic was foisted upon us.
In the U.K. for instance, all it takes for a COVID-19 death to be added to the official statistics, is for anyone to die within a 28 day time-frame of testing positive. That’s it.
There’s nothing scientific about it. No autopsy is carried out. The newly dead are offered as a sacrifice on the altar of medical tyranny and become nothing more than a nameless statistic aimed at frightening the living; particularly the unvaccinated.
How breakthrough deaths are reported on differently: Compare and Contrast
Now back to that Barbados report. The most striking thing about the death report of the unvaccinated, are the details left out. Absent from it are any illnesses or health problems the elderly woman might have had; comorbidities if you will. No. The unvaccinated do not get that benefit of the doubt. The unvaccinated do not get the privilege of good, responsible journalism. Anyone who commits the crime of dying while unvaccinated, will be posthumously shamed as having died, OF COVID-19; a just reward for “selfishly endangering” their vaccinated brethren.
Even the sober report from the Cayman Islands, failed to disclose such insignificant details as: how many breakthrough cases are there in that country? How many breakthrough deaths have occurred? If the vaccinated make up the majority of those hospitalised, why can’t we get an exact number?
Nothing passes the smell test with this thing.
But even posing such questions is seen as conspiratorial balderdash; a threat to the vaccine orthodoxy of our devoted political and medical overseers. Maybe that is why journalists in the main have quivered in fear at even the thought of asking them.
Octogenarian dies from COVID-related causes – Cayman Islands Headline News Cayman News Service